News : The level of daily SPAM has reached insane proportions, all registrations are now manual. I ask you to send me an e-mail (john (at) murga (dot) org), to confirm that you want me to create an account for you.

Post Reply  Post Thread 
testing presence of ML feature
Author Message

Posts: 381
Group: Administrators
Joined: Apr 2007
Status: Offline
Reputation: 2
Post: #1
RE: testing presence of ML feature

mikshaw Wrote:
Anyway, I wasn't saying that your string test isn't's the best thing possible as far as I can tell. My issue was that developers should be aware that they shouldn't use "0.6" as a test. They should either test for individual 0.6 features, or retain support for 0.5.5, or wait until 0.6.5 and use "0.6.5" as the minimum string.

Or use the "murgaLua_Version" ... That IS correct in the pre-release.

The full release is probably 0.6.5, and my target for pushing it out is Sunday night (Switzerland).

I have dropped one of my target features, but added several others along with a few FLTK fixes and additions.

John de Murga

02-08-2008 07:54 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply  Post Thread 

Messages In This Thread
testing presence of ML feature - mikshaw - 01-20-2008, 05:37 AM
RE: testing presence of ML feature - JohnMurga - 02-08-2008 07:54 AM

View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe to this Thread | Add Thread to Favorites

Forum Jump: