News : The level of daily SPAM has reached insane proportions, all registrations are now manual. I ask you to send me an e-mail (john (at) murga (dot) org), to confirm that you want me to create an account for you.


Post Reply  Post Thread 
testing presence of ML feature
Author Message
JohnMurga
Administrator
*******


Posts: 381
Group: Administrators
Joined: Apr 2007
Status: Offline
Reputation: 2
Post: #1
RE: testing presence of ML feature

mikshaw Wrote:
Anyway, I wasn't saying that your string test isn't useable...it's the best thing possible as far as I can tell. My issue was that developers should be aware that they shouldn't use "0.6" as a test. They should either test for individual 0.6 features, or retain support for 0.5.5, or wait until 0.6.5 and use "0.6.5" as the minimum string.

Or use the "murgaLua_Version" ... That IS correct in the pre-release.

The full release is probably 0.6.5, and my target for pushing it out is Sunday night (Switzerland).

I have dropped one of my target features, but added several others along with a few FLTK fixes and additions.

Cheers
John de Murga

02-08-2008 07:54 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply  Post Thread 

Messages In This Thread
testing presence of ML feature - mikshaw - 01-20-2008, 05:37 AM
RE: testing presence of ML feature - JohnMurga - 02-08-2008 07:54 AM

View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe to this Thread | Add Thread to Favorites

Forum Jump: